Beware of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community


Brother and sisters, do not join the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community. It is for “Muslims who believe in the Messiah, Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani”. As Muslims, we all believe that Prophet Muhammed (PBUH) is the last messenger of Allah and he even said so himself during his last sermon which I posted here. Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani claims to be a messiah and that he spoke to God. This is all nonsense and I urge you all to not fall into this organization’s trap. It was form by the British in 1857 when they started to lose control over India. which by the way is funded by the United States of America and we all know very well that America would never fund anything that would help spread the religion of Islam.

If there are any other organizations that you know of that try to turn people away from the religion of Islam, I urge you all to post a comment about it. It is very important that we all make sure that no Muslims can be fooled by such things and would be a great shame for them to die in a state of kufr. I ask Allah to guide us all to the straight path and may Allah bless us all for spreading da’wa and warning others about groups and organizations that are against Islam.


15 responses to “Beware of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community”

  1. So you think following scholars and reformers are non-Muslims for believing that a prophet can come?

    Mujaddid Alfe Saani, Hazrat Shaikh Ahmad Farooqi Sarhindi:
    Quote:
    Following the advent of the Khatmur-Rosul, Hazrat Muhammad Mustafa (peace and blessings of Allah be on him), the attainment of prophethood by one of his followers, as a subordinate and in service of the Holy Prophet, will in no way offend or be in conflict with his status as Khaatamur-Rosul. No doubts need be entertained in this regard.
    (Makoobat vol. 1 Maktoob 301 pg. 432)

    Hazrat Shah Waliullah Dehlavi, Mujaddid (reformer) of the 12th Century:
    Quote:
    The end of prophethood with the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) only means that there can now be no prophet for the people who will bring or introduce a new Shariah.
    (Tafhimate- ilahiyyah vol. 2 pg. 72-73)

    Maulana Rumi:
    Quote:
    Exert yourself in the service of faith to such an extent that you be granted prophethood within the Muslim Ummah.”
    (Masnawi Maulana Rum vol. 5, pg. 42)

    Brelvi scholar Maulavi Abu Al Hasnat Abdul Haye of Farangimahal, Lucknow:
    Quote:
    The advent of a mere prophet after the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) or in his lifetime is not an impossibility. To introduce a new law is indeed not permissible.
    (Dafiul-Waswas 2nd edition page 16)

    and

    Quote:
    Ulema Ahle-Sunnat also subscribe to the view that following the advent of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) no law-bearing prophet can come. The prophethood of the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) is wide in scope. Any prophet who would now come would be from the Ummah and follow his Shariah.
    (Majmuah Fatwa Maulvi Abdul Haye vol. 1 pg. 17)

    Al-Tirmizi (died 308 A-H.):
    Quote:
    The notion that the term ‘Khatamun-Nabbiyeen’ signifies that the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be on him) was the last prophet is erroneous. What glory and majesty is there in being the last? What wisdom underlies this interpretation? It is an interpretation put forth by the imbeciles and the illiterates.”
    (Khatam- Alauliya pg. 341)

    Maulana Qasim Nanutwi founder of Darul Aloom Deoband
    Quote:
    According to the layman, the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings on him, being Khatam is supposed to have appeared after all the other prophets. But men of understanding and the wise know it very well that being the first or the last, chronologically, does not carry any weight. How could, therefore, the words of the Holy Qur'an "'But he is the messenger of Allah and the Seal of Prophets" (33:40) mean to glorify him? But I know very well that none from among the Muslims would be prepared to agree with the common men.

    "In short, if the meaning of the word Finality is accepted as explained, then his Finality of Prophethood will not be exclusively attached to the past Prophet. But even if for instance another Prophet appeared during the era of the Prophet then too, him being the Final Prophet remains intact as normal."[40]

    "If for instance even after the era of the Prophet any Prophet is born, then too it will not make any difference to the Finality of Prophethood of the Prophet."
    (Tehzeerul Naas, variosu pages)

  2. Evidence is based on Imams and sheiks I've heard from locally but since they are not concrete evidences, i have crossed out what i said about America funding them.

  3. We Muslims must be very cautious while mingling with Ahmadies. They are enemy of Islam and want to raise their own Ahmadiyat parralel to Islam . They advocate their Ahmadiyat as a TRUE Islam brought by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, who also claimed himself as a Hindue Bhagwan named KRISHNA.

  4. "So you think following scholars and reformers are non-Muslims for believing that a prophet can come?"

    I'm saying Muhammed is the last messenger of Allah, based on his last sermon which i attached to this article. All those other quotes you mentioned are just trying to play around those words, and twisting it's meaning.

    I won't argue over this since I am not a scholar and won't be able to properly debate this issue, but if someone else would like to argue and debate all this, feel free to do so.

  5. Furthermore, a look into history offers great insights that solidify the aforementioned argument as this is not the first attempt undertaken by Britain to change Islam. In 1857 the British East India Company faced uprisings in India which mobilised the masses and threatened to end British rule in India. Jihad had been officially declared on the British by the Ulema of Hind and faced with the prospect of defeat attempts to pacify Muslim opposition led the British Empire to turn to Mirza Gulam Ahmed who was leader of a small group of people who denied jihad.

    Gulam said: "Behold! I have come to you people with a directive that henceforth jihad with the sword has come to an end but jihad for the purification of your souls still remains. This injunction is not from me but rather it is the will of God."

    He forbade fighting the Empire due to his favor for British rule and support, in a letter to queen Victoria he said:

    "…For the sake of the British government, I have published fifty thousand books, magazines and posters and distributed them in this and other Islamic countries. It is as the result of my endeavours that thousands of people have given up thoughts of Jihad which had been propounded by ill-witted mullahs and embedded in the minds of the people. I can rightly feel proud of this that no other Muslim in British India can equal me in this respect…"

    This attempt led to the British inventing a new faith and creating a new prophet, such a vain attempt gained no currency with the Muslim masses, instead hardening opposition to British colonialism.

    More evidence to not follow this: It was made up by the British.

    http://www.khilafah.com/index.php/analysis/europe/9143-new-report-exposes-british-governments-plan-to-change-islam

  6. Someone marked both as spam. When i took a look at them, i saw that it was just quotes without any analysis or argument. If you can provide that next time, your comments will stay.

  7. You should watch Mta everyday so you can know the truth in what we believe.You could get answers for your questions and clear your misunderstandings by watching Rah-e-huda

  8. @Anonymous,

    I do get what you are trying to say here:

    http://www.alislam.org/introduction/index.html

    This does talk about Mta. I agree, we all have different views about things and the way we see everything. However, in order for me to respect your views, I would like you to take a look at some of mine.

    We all believe in One God and His Book, The Noble Quran. Now, the Ahmediyyah movement is against "jihad". How is it that it is contradicting as to what the Quran is saying? Did not Prophet Muhammad (Sall Allahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) go on Jihad? What about his Companions (Radi Allahu Anhum)? They went on Jihad we well?

    I do not understand why is it that you are a small group that is following one man who claims to be a Prophet (Audzobillah). Ya3ny with all due respect, how it is that what you believe in, you find it to be the truth? Why not seek it? Why not try to find out what "You" really believe to be the truth than to just take what is presented to you by some man?

  9. It is obvious that Ahmadiyya is a movement created to undue the basics of Islam one by one. Positioning against Jihad makes it crystal clear. Most Ahmadi people are very nice, kind, andhighly educated but they are in a cultists type of environment and can not see the flaws in Ahmadiyya like we can.

  10. Beware of Ahmadiyya(Kafirs) they are not muslim.
    Ask them what they think about mirza ghulam Ahmed(modern muselama kazzab) if they say he's prohet then declare them as kafirs and bycott all sought of support.never trust them and see them .they are cult they are hyppocrites try to destroy intigrity of islam